Roundup of Congressional Pickup Opportunities in Ohio Posted

Ohio-based blogger RandomNonviolence has posted an excellent review of the seven congressional races in Ohio where Democrats have a chance to take over GOP-held seats, including background information for each district, total receipts and cash on hand as of the end of the 3rd quarter (plus independent expenditures), and endorsements and rankings by certain progressive commentators.

How do these races shake out in terms of likelihood of Democratic success? This is how the races rank as I see it:

OH-16 - State senator and military veteran John Boccieri (D-Alliance) is a tremendously appealing candidate and has emerged as the most likely contender to grab a Republican seat, aided by massive and unanswered DCCC expenditure and a lot of hard work on fund-raising and in the ground game. The most recent polling has shown Boccieri with a strong lead over State Sen. Kirk Schuring (R-North Canton): ten points in a Research2000 poll taken September 30-October 1 and eight points in a Survey USA poll taken September 19-21. I'll be very surprised (and disappointed) if Boccieri doesn't win this historically Republican but blue-trending district quite handily.

OH-15 - This district is more politically balanced than OH-16 but county commissioner Mary Jo Kilroy (D-Columbus) faces a stronger opponent in state senator and military veteran Steve Stivers (R-Upper Arlington) and the NRCC has been active in this race. Kilroy is nevertheless likely to win, helped by an anti-abortion third party candidate who draws some support away from Stivers and by help from the DCCC and Emily's List. Kilroy's attacks on Stivers as a career bank lobbyist are more compelling in the present political environment than Stivers' criticism of Kilroy's handling of a baseball park construction project on behalf of the county. A poll released two weeks ago by Democratic pollster Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research showed Kilroy with an eight point lead, and a Survey USA poll in late September showed her with a five point lead.

OH-01 - This district famously has the highest proportion of African-American voters of any GOP-held district (over 25%) and the fate of challenger State Rep. Steve Driehaus (D-Price Hill) probably hinges on turnout in the black community. Driehaus may fare better in the western suburbs than past Democratic candidates because he is opposed to abortion and grew up in the area, but the real key is whether urban voters in Cincinnati turn out in high numbers due to the presidential race. A Research 2000 poll on October 7 showed Driehaus up by two points over Rep. Steve Chabot (R-Westwood), and a Survey USA poll in late September showed Driehaus trailing by two points. I am hopeful about this race but not as confident as I am about OH-16 or OH-15.

OH-02 - Although Dr. Victoria Wulsin (D-Indian Hill) took Rep. Jean Schmidt (R-Loveland) to a recount in 2006, losing by only a few thousand votes, she still faces an uphill battle because this district has very a strong Republican lean and Wulsin has good progressive values. If Wulsin wins it will be the result of Schmidt's perverse talent for embarrassing gaffes and misrepresentations and the surprisingly strong bid by independent candidate David Krikorian (I-Madeira), a conservative small business owner. Wulsin is in the DCCC Red-to-Blue program but hasn't yet had the benefit of any independent expenditures. Survey USA showed Schmidt up by eight points in late September, but that poll didn't include Krikorian. A poll at the end of September commissioned by Wulsin showed her only a single point back, with Krikorian taking 11% of the vote. Schmidt claims that her internal polling shows her with a double-digit lead. Wulsin's chances depend on how deep is the evident dissatisfaction with Schmidt and the Republican brand. Although it won't be easy, a Wulsin victory could well occur especially if those predicting a Democratic wave election are correct.

OH-07 - This open-seat race is a sentimental favorite. Business attorney Sharen Neuhardt (D-Yellow Springs) is a political novice but she has worked very hard and has done just about everything right. Her efforts have earned the support of the DCCC and Emily's List. The district has a fairly strong GOP lean and hasn't had a Democratic representative since the 1930s, but GOP contender State Sen. Steve Austria (R-Beavercreek) is something of an empty suit and the tanking economy has opened the door for a pro-business Democrat like Neuhardt. Thanks to her strong fund-raising, Neuhardt has been able to run TV ads to help get her message out. Although Austria is not the incumbent he is a career politician and belongs to the party that has dominated this district (as well as state and federal government), and Neuhardt has worked hard to turn the anti-incumbent sentiment against him. Austria has responded with a despicable personal attack (characterizing Neuhardt's care for a Rwandan refugee as "harboring an illegal immigrant") and a lot may depend on how voters respond to that tactic. There hasn't been any polling released to show Neuhardt close to Austria, but some polls indicate a generic Democratic candidate close to a generic Republican and Obama is doing surprisingly well here. Neuhardt is in good position to pull off an upset if the election moves strongly toward Democrats across the board.

OH-03 - This relatively balanced district would be eminently winnable if it were an open seat, but incumbent Mike Turner (R-Centerville) is a former mayor of Dayton (where most of votes are located) and is going to be very hard to dislodge despite news reports linking him to questionable dealings (earning him a "Dishonorable Mention" from CREW). Challenger Jane Mitakides (D-Washington Twp) is no political novice, generally praised for taking 41% of the vote against Turner in 2004, but Turner has a 5-to-1 advantage in cash-on-hand and the DCCC has not picked up this race. Without a TV campaign against Turner, it is hard to see the incumbent getting dislodged here.

OH-14 - It is painful to write about this race because I have a lot of respect for flinty Vietnam veteran and former appellate judge Bill O'Neill (D-South Russell), but incumbent Rep. Steve LaTourette (R-Bainbridge Twp) is a GOP power-broker with deeply entrenched support from local interests and the GOP establishment. LaTourette ought to be vulnerable due to his ties to Jack Abramoff and Bob Ney and his cozy relationship with special interests, but he has a huge financial advantage in this race and it doesn't look like the challenger is going to be able to get on television. O'Neill was slowed by heart surgery in May and for whatever reasons is not in a position to wage the kind of high-profile campaign that might overcome LaTourette's name recognition and the advantages of incumbency.

"we're in good shape"

I received this comment from a prominent Democratic congressional campaign operative:

"I think we're in good shape, but we'll see. For as much as I trust and believe in polling, there's only one poll that matters. Everything before and after is pure conjecture."

Which pretty much sums it up, I think.

In order for Democrats to win in Ohio, we have got to get not just "good" numbers from the large urban centers, we need GREAT results. We have to get both a high turnout AND a very high percentage of those who vote.

And with Senator Obama at the top of the ticket, it's entirely reasonable to expect that.

So I think Steve Driehaus is going to win. And to flip FOUR House seats (Space, Boccieri, Kilroy and Dreihaus) over two elections is historic.

Remember when the GOPers were howling about how Zack Space was so "endangered"? Yeah, right. That's REPRESENTATIVE Space to you buddy!

So count on the Ohio GOP to continue to everything that they can to discourage or disenfranchise as many voters as they can.

What they can't win at the polls, they will steal through the courts.

OH-03

Challenger Jane Mitakides (D-Washington Twp) is no political novice, generally praised for taking 41% of the vote against Turner in 2004, but Turner has a 5-to-1 advantage in cash-on-hand and the DCCC has not picked up this race. Without a TV campaign against Turner, it is hard to see the incumbent getting dislodged here.

I saw this Mitakides TV ad for the first time last night during Olbermann's post-debate Countdown on MSNBC.


The ad was posted to Youtube on 02-25-2008, but last night was the first time I've ever seen it on either a local or cable channel. Too little, too late, and targets the base (during Olbermann, for Pete's sake!) rather than the persuadables in the middle. If there is a Mitakides TV campaign, it needs to be a lot smarter than that.

Praised for Losing

If you look at CQ Voting and Elections Connection, 2004 House Elections: State Results, (http://www.cqpress.com/docs/2004Elections/2004House2n-w.htm)
Mitakides took in 37.7% of the vote...since when do we praise our candidates for losing by more than 24%?

This woman is a joke

This is a joke of a candidate, and the Democrats should be ashamed for nominating her.

OH-3

While Ohio may find some great upsets by their Congressional Democratic challengers this November, it will unfortunately not be the case for Ohio's Third Congressional District.

As far as it looks, Jane Mitakides has run a less than stellar campaign simply based on her FEC reports. It looks as though she lacks the ability to raise money, and is dependent on self-financing. Why loan the campaign $80,000.00, and in-kind another $150,000.00+ over the course of the election? Any serious candidate (one that would consider using personal funds) would have invested the money during the primary and worked to attract the national attention early.

And what is up with this ad? Poor quality (looks like a home video), no substance, and a cable buy. The previous poster even said that it was the first time they had seen it, so does that mean she only bought on cable, and only to the basevote audience? What a strategy, or waste of money.

When given the background of Jane Mitakides, and an overview of the campaign that has been run, you have to ask yourself one question: why would the DCCC even give this race a look? In 2010, maybe the Democratic Party will recruit a real candidate, and not a soon-to-be two-time loser.

The recent DDN article suggests you may be wrong

Martin Gottlieb writes that OH-3 is the best chance for Democrats in SW Ohio to reclaim a seat in the House.

Here's the full article:
http://www.daytondailynews.com/o/content/oh/story/opinions/editorial/200...

My OH-03 picks for 2010

@Anonymous 4:54 -

In 2010, maybe the Democratic Party will recruit a real candidate, and not a soon-to-be two-time loser.

Re credible candidates against Turner, I'd like to see any of the following:

  1. Fred Strahorn
  2. Tom Roberts
  3. Judy Dodge

Probably won't happen, but any one of them would force Turner to work at defending his seat, and might well take it from him.

 
PS Jeff: the "reply" option on the comment refused to work, said the comment didn't exist, and there was some other general site flakiness. Call Ghostbusters.

PPS: Look at the YouTube still, along the bottom. "Endorsed by the Dayton Daily News." No wonder it was posted so long ago. This ad is from the Primary, and she ran it to the base two weeks before the general. That would be deceptive if it wasn't so plainly half-assed.

Oh-01 Steve Chabot may lose

I lived in this district when Chabot took control from David Mann in 2004, the year of the "contract for America". He won by a small margin last time around, but this time, with an even more unfavorable environment & a more well known candidate, I think we may take Chabot down this time.

For me, as a former resident of this district, this would be sweet!!!, please don't let me down voters!!!

1994

1994

The Views Expressed In Reader-Contributed Comments, Forums And Posts Are Not Necessarily Those Of OhioDaily, Plus2 Communications LLC Or Its Management.