Virtually all the Catholics I know have been really thrilled with the Pope Francis, who was elected in March 2013 when the widely despised rightwing Pope Benedict XIV suddenly and mysterious retired. They have appreciated that he has shifted the church’s focus from an obsession with sex, fulminating against gay marriage, abortion and contraception and attempting to meddle in U.S. elections, to a broader vision that involves care of humanity and care of the planet.
It seems some sex-obsessed bishops and archbishops have not gotten the message — and that includes Cleveland Bishop Richard Lennon, himself not too popular with the flock.
Some of you may have seen stories of the increasing numbers of hysterical bishops, desperate to maintain control over the flock’s genitals, who have been requiring teachers in their schools — who very often these days aren’t Catholic since the church has driven all the nuns away — to sign “morality” pledges promising never, ever to speak out on any of the church’s hot button issues or to do or say anything that might indicate a position that might now align with the church’s. Your son is gay? Too bad. Anything you say or do to support his relationship is forbidden.
Such clauses have already cropped up in Cincinnati and Columbus. In Cincinnati, a teacher quit at the prospective of being told she could not publicly support her gay son.
In Columbus a lesbian teacher was fired after her partner’s name appeared in an obituary for her mother. The diocese reached a settlement with her.
Are you fed up with a bunch of rightwing, mostly male lawmakers in our state capital, spouting about freedom and less government out of one side of their mouth and appointing themselves the doctors of Ohio's women out of the other?
It seems "getting the government off our backs" doesn't apply to the most life-changing choice a woman can make: whether and when to have children. This gang of clowns in our statehouse has been relentlessly trying to strip women of any agency and control in their lives, condemning lower-income women — those predominantly affected by their cruel, invasive laws — and their children to lives of increased poverty. And if you read my earlier post you know poverty among Ohio children has dramatically increased already, to a quarter of Ohio's kids. And with the lack of social and economic mobility in the U.S. many of those kids are consigned to lifetimes of poverty.
If you are angry and want to let our state legislators known how you feel, pro-choice groups have organized Freedom of Choice Advocacy Day this Wednesday April 22 in Columbus.
"Freedom of Choice Ohio will hold our annual Advocacy Day on April 22. This year, Ohio women and men will gather at the Ohio Statehouse to learn more about the significant, multiple threats to reproductive health care. Armed with information and training, participants will engage their legislators to show that their constituents do not support abortion bans or attacks on funding."
The day starts at 9:30am with registration and a light breakfast, followed by a keynote speaker and a short training session so you know the proper way to approach the staff in the legislator's office (who you will probably be talking to). They will assign groups the offices to visit; they have made the appointments for you so you don't have to worry about a thing. You will also get lunch.
If this sounds good to you, here's where you go to register:
"Republican Ohio Gov. John Kasich Is Waiting For God To Tell Him To Run For President"
Anyone who thinks God will deliver this message is delusional and unfit to be President. Ahem, Sarah Palin.
The pompous, sanctimonious governor put piety on ostentatious display on Meet the Press, saying, "My family is a consideration, and number two, the most important thing is, what does the Lord want me to do with my life? You know, he puts us on Earth, all of us on Earth, to achieve certain purposes, and I’m trying to determine if this is what the Lord wants, and I’m not going to figure that out laying in bed hoping lightning strikes, so I’m out there one foot in front of another. We’ll see what happens.”
Really, Taxin' John? Did the Lord also tell you to attack working people and take away their rights? Did He also tell you that you needed to give more money back to the rich and pass the bill on to ordinary people scraping to get by? Did you tell you to turn your back on the needs of children and the elderly in order to reward your rich campaign donors?
Isn't it funny how all of that contradicts the message he sent through Jesus Christ, who you as a "Christian" supposedly consider the Son of God? It must have been a while since you read the Gospels. And yet you are so full of yourself, you think you have some special purpose the Lord will determine.
Here's something: why don't you actually READ the Gospels and the things Jesus preached, and if you actually believe, use those as a guideline to your "purpose" instead of exhaling these high-flown words? Unfortunately, you would probably have to change your whole way of thinking, what you said during the 2010 campaign about making Ohio a "test lab for conservative ideology." And that ideology is at odds with the Gospels.
Matt Bird, a policy and program assistant at the enter for Community Solutions, writes on the Policy Matters Ohio blog:
"The Center for Community Solutions has released a new series of county profiles that show an increase in poverty, food pantry use and Medicaid enrollment despite a strengthening economy."
Bad news from CCS here:
Yes, he says, the number of jobs has been slowly increasing throughout Ohio (though it's been lagging job growth nationwide for several years), although seven counties — Clinton, Cuyahoga, Hamilton, Lucas, Montgomery, Summit, and Trumbull — have employment levels more than 10,000 below their 2007 levels.
But here's your problem, says Bird:
"Of the top five employment sectors by number of employees, two — retail trade and accommodation and food services — have average annual pay of less than $30,000 per year. The other largest sectors — health care and social assistance, manufacturing, and educational services — all have average annual pay of greater than $40,000."
And we all know which job categories have been growing the fastest. By 2013, median household income had dropped nearly 12 percent in a decade and 15.8 percent of Ohians — including many working Ohioans — were living in poverty. That included more than a quarter of children under five, meaning a more impoverished future for them.
Bird wrote that SNAP recipients had increased 59 percent since 2006 but still weren't meeting the need, stressing out food pantries.
The one bright spot: Medicaid extension meant 470,000 more Ohioans enrolled and covered. So now, almost a quarter of the Ohio's population is enrolled in Medicaid. That's good but it's also an indication of how poor the state is becoming.
An Opinion from the Grassroots
By Karen Marotta
I think the Ohio Democratic Party made a mistake by prematurely endorsing a candidate for the US Senate. A more thoughtful approach by the leadership would allow a robust debate on the issues which would lead to strengthening the message for the winner of the Primary Election. As a grassroots activist in a red county, I know how important it is to have good Democratic candidates. When a young person is willing to run for office and fight for our values, we cannot afford to discount them.
I live in the 2nd Congressional district and in 2014 we were shown what a primary should be. We were lucky to have multiple candidates for the race and two of them, Ronny Richards and Marek Tyszkiewicz conducted themselves with integrity and mutual respect. When Marek won, Ronny worked harder than anyone to get him elected. Even though we lost the race, we were proud to have these men represent our Party.
PG Sittenfeld should have been welcomed with open arms into the race for the Senate. He and Ted Strickland should have been encouraged to face off on the issues, emphasizing how important it is that we win back the Senate in 2016. This could have been an opportunity for the Party leaders to encourage new candidates and allow them the experience and the name recognition they will need to be successful in future races. The resources spent on this would have paid dividends in a united, energized Party that attracts and invites new members and new voters.
As it stands now, there's no money in the state budget to mail out absentee ballots in 2016. Because of course not.
The latest state budget, submitted to the legislature by spending addict Taxin’ John Kasich is a record-busting $72 BILLION. But Ohio legislature has nixed the request from secretary of state Jon Husted — for once not the bad guy — for a mere $1.25 million to mail absentee ballots to votes across the state in 2016 for the presidential election. Because of course we want to humiliate the state still more by having one of the worse turnouts in the nation. In a presidential year. Gotta keep those voters and those ballots apart.
“It's not in there yet," said Husted's optimistic press secretary Joshua Eck told the Columbus Dispatch. He who added they've been given no indication that lawmakers against it. Ha ha. Yes, it’s just like if David Brennan of the failing White Hat Charter Schools wanted another $100 million.
Last month assistant secretary of state Matt Damschroder testified to the House Finance Committee that “In the grand scheme of things, $1.25 million is a small price to pay to ensure that when all eyes are on Ohio, we deliver another smooth presidential election.”
You’d think. But maybe let’s play our little games first instead of treating this as a no-brainer. But the House members the Dispatch spoke with were vague and noncommittal, like this is no big thing. Speaker Cliff Rosenberger said maybe the money would be added. At some point. When he’s good and ready.
“There is absolutely no reason that this modest request was not among the amendments that made it into the substitute budget bill,” said League of Women Voters of Ohio executive director Carrie Davis. “If the legislature refuses to fund the Secretary of State’s absentee mailing next year, then they ought to repeal the prohibition on the Secretary of State or other government offices sending absentee applications on their own.”
Taxin' John Kasich's record as governor has been mostly dismal. It's been six years of reckless spending, increased taxes, cuts to local governments and public schools, lax charter school oversight and repeated scandals as well as failure, lagging job creation, shrinking middle class, growing poverty, attacks on women's rights .... the list goes on and on.
The Republican regime in Columbus has especially been notable for its attacks on fair elections, with attempts at creating obstacles and confusion for voters coming from Secretary of State Jon Husted, attorney general MIke DeWine, and of course, our neanderthal legislature.
It was the latter who decided, in their infinite lack of wisdom, to insert a provision into the transportation bill that required college students to acquire an Ohio drivers license and car registration within 30 days of coming to Ohio if they wanted to vote at a cost that could be as high as nearly $100 — you know, a poll tax.
I know some have said "They should vote at home if they don't intend to live here." The problem is college students often don't know where they will end up. Their lives are in flux. Why get a brand new drivers license (especially since many students have no access to a car while at school) if you don't know where you'll ultimately be going? But the present reality for most is their college. And by letting them have a voice in what goes on in their new hometown, you give them a stake in it and a reason to stay.
I wasn't clear to me what would happen if a student's car title was in their parent's name, a not-uncommon thing for a college kid. Whatever. The design of this was clear: create yet another expensive, time-consuming and confusing obstacle.
We all remember how Taxin’ John Kasich ran a campaign last year based on a big lie — that he had somehow performed an “economic miracle” and that Ohio’s economy was roaring.
And it is — in reverse.
A new study from Pew Charitable Trusts shows that out of 50 states, Ohio had the second largest decline in its middle class, exceeded only by Wisconsin.
The number of middle class households in Ohio dropped from 50.9 percent in 2000 to 45.7 percent in 2013. Median income fell from $56,434 to $48,081 in the same time period. The share of households spending at least 30 percent of their income on housing jumped from 25 to 30 percent.
Obviously, given that time frame, not all of that is due to Kasich. Two other governors and a major recession caused by George Bush were also involved. But it sure puts a damper on Kasich’s claims that Ohio has completely recovered thanks to him and is doing so well. It’s not. It continues to struggle.
And it seems like Kasich and our legislature just continue to look for ways to push it back own when it tries to get up. Kasich’s proposed taxation program slams ordinary working people with a sales tax and cuts to local government that have fueled an endless cycle of levies. In my city, we’re facing the THIRD Kasich school levy in six years. If passed, property taxes here will have increased more than $600 per $100,000 valuation. We’re not an anomaly.
There's a lot of empty nattering about "protecting life" and caring for the "unborn" coming from from proponents of the punitive Heartbeat Bill which passed the Ohio House yesterday by a vote of 55-40 — 54 typically misogynist Republicans and one so-called "Democrat" — Cleveland's Bill Patmon, of course.
But one Democrat gave exceptionally powerful testimony about why the bill is not just wrong-headed but incredible cruel. Toledo state representative Teresa Fedor stood up and for the first time publicly told the story of her own abortion.
She revealed that when she was a young woman in the military, she was raped and because pregnant. She chose to have an abortion.
You don’t respect my reason, my rape, my abortion, and I guarantee you there are other women who should stand up with me and be courageous enough to speak that voice. What you’re doing is so fundamentally inhuman, unconstitutional, and I’ve sat here too long.
I dare any one of you to judge me, because there’s only one judge I’m going to face. This debate is purely political. I understand your story, but you don’t understand mine. I’m grateful for that freedom. It is a personal decision, and how dare government get into my business.
Smug, sanctimonious state rep. Christina Hagan, who is being used by the Republicans in the legislature as the pretty young face of their movement clearly has a lot of learning to do as far as understanding and respecting the beliefs and situation of others who have not been as fortunate as she, told the Toledo Blade,
The woman haters in our state legislature just won’t give up their fight to make Ohio women poorer and less free, with fewer choices and control over their own lives.
The ghastly — and unconstitutional — Heartbeat Bill keeps rising from the dead like a particularly smelly zombie. Passed once before in the Ohio House but dying in the Senate and then falling short in the House last year, the bill, HB 69, passed the Ohio House by a vote of 55-40. It bans all abortions with no rape or incest exceptions after a fetal heartbeat can be detected or about six weeks — before many women even know they are pregnant.
The House exposed its true intentions by voting down amendments requiring that emergency contraception be available to rape victims, providing healthcare coverage to low-income pregnant women and offering paid maternity leave.
As Senator Sherrod Brown said in an email today touting his Improving Access to Maternity Care Act in the U.S. Senate, “Babies born to mothers who did not receive prenatal care are three-times more likely to be low birth weight and five-times more likely to die than babies whose mothers received prenatal care.”
That makes it crystal clear that the welfare of babies, born or unborn, is immaterial to Ohio House Republicans (and one loathsome Democrat, Bill Patmon who represents a section of Cleveland with a high infant mortality rate). The only thing that matters is stripping poor and working women of their rights and punishing them for having sex.
Not that this is news, but these people need to spare use the phony baloney about “the unborn.” That narrative is dead. When Rep. Christina Hagan, one of the bill’s sponsors who has been acting as a sort of legislative face for the anti-choice movement, said, “We have the ability to save many lives,” she was right. She forgot to add that they’re not doing that. Instead they want to condemn women and children to poverty.
When I comes to voting, it seems like there’s a life-or-death tug of war going on in this country — and the stakes are nothing less than the life or death of American democracy.
Last week when President Obama spoke at the City Club of Cleveland, he put out an intriguing and controversial proposal. He suggested that voting be made mandatory, with a small fine for those who did not vote without a good reason. (It’s not some wild, untried idea; Australia already has mandatory voting).
This came on the heels of the news that the state of Oregon — which went to all mail-in voting 15 years ago and has one of the highest levels of voter participation as a result — had passed opt-out voter registration. It automatically registers a person to vote when they apply for a drivers license or a state I.D. The voter has 21 days to indicate they don’t want to be register. Oregon’s participation is going to go through the roof, making it a true fountain of democracy.
It’s a complete reversal of what we have been seeing since so many state governments were taken over by Republicans in the last five or six years. Their campaign has succeeded in making it harder to vote in at least half of all states. According to Ari Berman in The Nation, 395 new voting restrictions were introduced in 49 states between 2011-2015.
There is no rationale for these new restrictions — no flaw in any state’s election system that requires tightening up the rules or making the process of voting more confusing and more challenging. All claims of voter fraud — especially voter fraud that could be prevented by increasing use of voter I.D. at the polling place — have been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked.
Jeb Bush — for real?
Seriously, isn’t it time the media and Beltway wise men gave up this idea that a familiar name is the most valuable thing you can have in an election? Sure, I get the name recognition thing. What I don’t get is the idea that you can only START the race — two years, three years, four years out — with a name people know. No matter WHAT they know.
I mean, ok, forget Hillary Clinton and Ted Strickland for a minute.
Someone tell me, why is Jeb Bush a thing? Why is he considered viable by anyone at all?
Look: the name is “Bush.” As in one of the worst presidents of all time who left us with a deep recession and two wars. As in an unpopular president who lost as the incumbent after his first term. That’s BUSH — B-U-S-H.
Want a personal email scandal? Jeb Bush has got one coming right up! It took him seven years to release his emails from her term as governor (it took Hillary four months). Like Hillary, he and his staff decided what to release. Unlike Hillary, they didn’t release a bunch of constituent phone numbers and social security numbers. Oops, as fellow presidential candidate Rick Perry might say.
A friend to education, as he’s been hyping himself? He’s got a lot in the scandal basket there!
For one thing, he is a massive enemy of public education, pushing charters and vouchers and everything he can to wreck traditional public schools. Yet the pride-and-joy public school he helped start and points to as an example of what a great model charters are has ended in ruin and closed, pointing out all the pitfalls involved in the heedless rush to replace public schools with charters.
I asked the other day what elected Democrats would show up to the City Club of Cleveland's event with President Obama today, in light of the fact that Republicans avoided George Bush like the plague when he appeared in 2006, during his second term.
Now we know. Here are Cuyahoga County's two Democratic congresswomen getting off Air Force One. They flew back to Cleveland from Washington with the President. I hope they spent the time mocking tools like Tom Cotton, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul and poor orange John Boehner.
Unlike Steve LaTourette in 2006, they didn't have staff meeting they just couldn't get out of.
Here's another photo:
In the background also getting off the plane is Senator Sherrod Brown, also not ashamed to be seen with the President. He was probably passing around pictures of Franklin on that plane.
Our state chair, David Pepper, was there too, and took this photo of Air Force One flying over Cleveland. Clearly he doesn't think the President is toxic to Democrats in Ohio.
We've seen this game before. In order to avoid a "divisive primary," we need to "clear the field" and rally behind one candidate. And the powers that be have decided that for Senate in 2016, we're going to swallow Ted Strickland whether we like it or not. And many of us would like to explore some other choices, especially this early in the game.
And this is REALLY early — like, insanely early. The nastiness between Sherrod Brown and Paul Hackett in the 2006 race did not occur until the FALL of 2005 (the equivalent of about six months from now) with neither candidate announcing until then. And Hackett stayed in the race until he was forced out — in February 2006. That would be the equivalent of almost a full year from now,
In February 2009, both Jennifer Brunner and Lee Fisher announced their intention to run in the Democratic primary for Senate in May 2010 — and both did so. There were certainly attempts to get Brunner out of the race but other than those coming from Strickland's people, there was not the similar piling on we're seeing now.
Apparently word has come from somewhere, probably the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee (DSCC), which is always mesmerized by names they know rather than recruiting the potentially best candidate, that we have to rally behind Strickland NOW.
And the pressure is on to get P.G. Sittenfield, the young Cincinnati city councilman who announced his candidacy well before Strickland did, out of the race before anyone even has a chance to get to know him or assess what he has to offer.
So far, I've received notices of Strickland endorsements from Senator Sherrod Brown, outgoing Columbus mayor Michael Coleman, Columbus city council member and mayoral candidate Andrew Ginther, Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley, and three of the state's four Democratic congresspersons, Tm Ryan, Marcia Fudge and Joyce Beatty. (As far as I know, Marcy Kaptur hasn't announced support for anyone at this point).
Yesterday the City Club of Cleveland announced that President Obama will be coming to that downtown Cleveland institution to speak this coming Wednesday.
He's expected to take unscreened questions from the audience following his presentation, which is supposed to be about the economy and what we need to do about the fact that ordinary working people are falling further and further behind.
What I'm interested to see is who shows up.
I recall when George W. Bush made a similar appearance during his second term in March 2006.
At that time, the tide had decisively turned on him, following his terrible month of August 2005 when his refusal to meet with anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan led to a month-long protest outside his Crawford Ranch. That proved to be the flashpoint that ignited opposition to the Iraq War. Then came Katrina and his thoughtless, heartless handling of the hundreds of thousands of people impacted. Bush never recovered.
When Bush's City Club appearance was announced, all of a sudden the politicians who normally like to rub elbows with the high and mighty were nowhere to be found.
At the time I was working at the Free Times. Fax was already becoming an obsolete technology so I was the only one who ever leafed through the pile to find good stuff amid all the cruise offers. And I found some good stuff, like a fax from the office of then-Congressman Steve LaTourette (R), expressing his regrets that he could not make it to the City Club because he had a staff meeting.
Seriously? He couldn't reschedule a staff meeting for the President of the United States? Of his own party? Judging from most staff meetings I've been to, his staff would have been relieved and actually got some productive work done instead.
Look, yes, of course, policy-wise he is better than Portman. But when will be given some good, forward-thinking choices?
When will we stop going backward wistfully into the past? 2006 was a long time ago. And while Strickland was a decent governor (certainly compared to present company), he blew it in 2010. No, he wasn't a victim of a Republican wave year. He made a bunch of mistakes, some of which still fester among the activist base.
I have nothing against Ted Strickland but he is a profoundly unexciting choice for Senate. He comes from a prior generation, and at age of 75, would be one of the oldest first-term Senators ever. That's unlikely to engage younger voters or progressive activists. (And progressives are the ones most likely to view him as a "Blue Dog" conservadem). Given the regularity with which I heard "Please, no Strickland people" during the hunt for a new state chair, I have to think this is going to be alienating to some.
Finally, it sends a message that our party isn't interesting is engaging younger people and helping them rise to the top slots; it's interested in blocking them. I'm not even talking about CIncinnati councilman P.G.Sittenfield who has announced his run and about whom I know almost nothing. I'm talking about the bench of great people we have who are a decade or two or three younger than Strickland. What do they do now? Wait for him to die?
Strickland got beaten by a petulant, unappealing bully, John Kasich. I keep hearing "Oh, that was an off year; more Democrats will turn out in 2016." That's true. But Portman's got a good facade. He's no Kasich. He's friendly and likable and doesn't say crazy things like some of his GOP colleagues. He'll be tough for any Democrat to beat. I'd love to be proved wrong, but with Ted Strickland, I think we have almost no chance.
I'm sure you can guess. I don't even have a comment on these facts which come courtesy of Innovation Ohio because I have steam coming out my ears.
5 Take-Aways on Kasich's Charter Funding Plan
1. Over half of Ohio's school districts face cuts in this budget proposal, but not one charter school loses funding.
2. Three times as much of the increase goes to charters with a D grade or lower than goes to those with above-average scores.
3. Nearly half of the increase to charter schools goes to for-profit charters.
4. On a per pupil basis, charters will receive a 33% larger increase than the average traditional school district.
5. Every local school district in Ohio will lose more money to charters.
More here if you think you can stand it and not head over to Kasich's house with torches and pitchforks. One second thought —
The Republicans in our state legislature just never give up on the idea that poor and working women are brainless sluts whose private lives need to be controlled by the most massively big and invasive government you can imagine and pushed into poverty and desperation for being so foolish as to have sex. I mean, isn't that why you elected your state representatives — to decide who can have sex without consequences? (Men and affluent women).
Yes, the Heartbeat Bill is back. Because they haven't introduced enough repressive, misogynist legislation rife with medieval thinking, they've brought back this offensive thing. See for yourself:
Now called HB 69, it's full of the usual gooey, inaccurate, lying language such bills have to rely on because there's little validity to them other than to shame women and rob them of their options.
At the same time, this legislature has done nothing to provide quality education for these economically challenged children they want to force to be born — because, as Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said on MSNBC Friday, "“We will never see a day when women of means are not able to get a safe abortion in this country." In fact, it's introducing a maze of new rules and regulations that will make it worse. They're addressing infant mortality in a haphazard way: a bandaid here, a knife wound there. And oh yes — guns! More guns!
It cannot be emphasized enough — since our state "news" papers letter our governor Taxin' John Kasich get away with his myth of fiscal responsibility — that Kasich is spending Ohio into ruin. The man who absurdly boasted of somehow "fixing" a $6 billion deficit that never existed had now grown Ohio's spending more than 40 percent since he took off.
If you really want to get steamed, especially over the fact that our "news" papers just act like this isn't really significant, read this:
Opportunity Ohio's dissection of Ksich's reckless spending points out that Kasich is relying on some very unlikely scenarios of revenue growth to allow him to keep spending like it's going out of style. Even with all the tax increases he wants to slam ordinary working people with, it probably won't be enough to pat for this binge. And it's possible the far-right legislature won't grant him many of the tax increases he wants. What then, Taxin' John?
As opportunity Ohio points out, if Kasich keeps increasing state spending at the rate he's going we could see a 60 percent increase by the time he leaves office. And here's the most galling thing — what are WE getting for it? He's suggesting schools tap their rainy-day funds to make up for his damaging cuts, a really reckless thing to do.
It's amazing to me that ANYONE thinks of Kasich as a budgetary whiz. He violates basic, common-sense rules that grade schoolers would know better than to do. His attitude has always been to grab what he wants for himself and his buddies and let the rest of us foot the bill.
It seems like Youngstown Congressman Tim "The Good" Ryan's name getting mentioned any time there's a race for Senate or governor being discussed. Some people were bandying his name around again to face Rob Portman, who comes up for reelection in 2016.
Ryan has put the kibosh on that, sending out an email that says,
I appreciate your continued support and I wanted to reach out to let you know that today, after much thought and deliberation, I am announcing my decision not to run for the United States Senate in 2016. With my new and growing family, I feel now is the time to be close to home. It is an honor and privilege to serve the people of Ohio in the House of Representative and I look forward to continuing to use my position on the Appropriations Committee and the Budget Committee to increase investments in manufacturing, promote wellness in our health and food policies, and protect American jobs by fighting against unfair trade practices. Thank you again for your support while I made this important decision.
So far, the "clearly interested" list includes two names: former governor Ted Strickland, who has only expressed interest, and Cincinnati city councilman P.G. Sittenfeld, who has said he is running. I know nothing about Sittenfeld. Hopefully he gets his butt up to Cleveland soon. But as good a governor as I think Strickland was (and he certainly wasn't addicting to throwing around our tax dollars recklessly like Taxin' John Kasich), I just don't think we should go backward.
As for Portman, I have heard people say he will be difficult to beat because he's pleasant and doesn't say crazy stuff so he has been spun as a "moderate." Maybe by the standards of today's batshit crazy GOP but in terms of supporting what most people want to see happen and what would benefit the average person, he's far right.
No, this isn't about "unborn children" or "killing babies." I know it, you know it and all the right-wing anti-lifers know it. It all about punishing the sluts i.e. any woman they perceive as not being obedient to their extremely rigid view of how women should behave.
Almost two years ago, the legislature and our governor, Taxin' John Kasich, stuffed some anti-choice stuff into the budget bill — a probably illegal and definitely inappropriate move — that instantly plummeted Ohio to the basement as far as women's reproductive rights go.
But they're not happy, no. Ohio's neanderthal misogynists are proposing still more mean-spirited intrusive, super-big government measures to limit women's life choices and assure that more Ohio women and children fall into poverty.
What do they want to see happen?
First they want to ban ALL abortions at 20 weeks — the ones overwhelming sought due to tragic medical complications by women who really really wanted a baby. This would cause a massive amount of suffering and probable deaths. In addition, due to the obstacles already put in the way of abortion for poor and working women, more and more women are pushed into later abortions.
Then they want to make sure that if Roe v. Wade is overturned, Ohio can be first out of the box to return to the "good old days" of coathangers and back-alley abortions by banning all abortions. They want to put in place a law that will automatically ban ALL abortions if Roe is overturned. Watch young people flee the state in even greater numbers.
Guest Column by Michael Uth
Member, ACLU of Ohio Board of Directors
Memo to the police nationwide: You say you want respect, but you don't seem to have even a hint of a clue on how to earn it. Here are some suggestions:
Show Respect and It Will Be Reciprocated. This starts with the mayor of your city. Don't ever turn your back on him in anger when you're in uniform. It's insolent and uncomfortably close to mutiny. When you disrespect our elected representative, you also disrespect us. We elected him, not you. Arrogant, contemptuous behavior toward our chosen leader will not make us respect you.
Embrace Accountability. You spend your days helping to hold other people accountable, but remember, accountability, like respect, is a two-way street. You know when you have bad behavior by officers on your force. Stop protecting them. Admit when they make mistakes. Report all police shootings to the FBI. Start keeping accurate records of all those SWAT team raids—especially the botched ones. Stop opposing meaningful oversight by independent civilian review boards. We can't respect you if you continue to scorn accountability.
Honor the Bill of Rights. Among other things, this means laying off the peaceful protesters, dialing down the stop-and-frisks and putting the brakes on no-knock search raids. Smashing through people's front doors in the middle of the night without warning to execute routine search warrants for non-violent crimes does not make us respect you, especially when you get the wrong address, which happens more often than most people know. (See accountability above.) Our founding fathers started a revolution over less egregious law enforcement abuses than this; King George's men at least had the decency to knock and announce themselves before entering colonists' homes to search for contraband. And they didn't use flash-bang grenades.
I was sitting in a meeting tonight scrolling through my Facebook feed when a post popped up from someone I knew with a fact so incredible, so stunning and so outrageous, I assumed it must be either a joke or a mistake.
Taxin' John Kasich just submitted his proposed 2016-2017 budget for Ohio, which has to be passed by June 30. As people who know me or follow this blog may know (but people who get their news from the Cleveland Plain Dealer or the Columbus Dispatch would have no way of guessing), Kasich's endless self-congratulation about his budgetary genius is simply a lie.
His boasts about have done amazing feat of balancing the state budget is, of course, ridiculous. It's required by law and every governor has done it.
But in his last two budgets, this self-proclaimed thrifty money manager increased state spending radically, making his claims laughable. Ted Strickland left him with a budget for 2010-2011 of $50.5 billion, cut from an earlier $56 billion due to the Bush recession which hit Ohio so hard. Kasich's first budget called for restoring spending to $56 billion. But his 2014-2015 asked for a huge increase — to $62 billion.
Think that was extreme? You ain't seen nothing yet. Kasich is now proposing a monstrous, bloated elephant (how appropriate!) of a budget, racking in at $72.3 billion. Ohio has never seen spending on this reckless, bankruptcy-courting level. We should take up a collection to send Kasich to rehab for his spending addiction.
How's he going to pay for it, you ask? Ha! What do you think Taxin' John is going to do? While he's making a big public deal of his proposed 23 % income tax cut and some additional proposed deductions, you're not going to see much in your bank account, unless you are among Ohio's 1 percent.
That's the buzz going around today. While some people are jumping up and down in excitement because it's a Name They Know, all I can say is "Please — no."
Look: I am not among those (primarily more left-leaning Democrats) who think he was way too conservative a governor. He had a very Republican Senate for his entire term and a Republican run House for half of it. And yet he got a lot done, much of it by consensus. Compared to our current governor, he was a governing genius. Any idea how his last budget compared to Kasich's current one? Since the big self-important mainstream media won't tell you I will. Strickland's last budget was $50.5 billion. Tax-and-spend Kasich's is $62 billion.
But Strickland's time has come and gone. He didn't lose (by a mere 2 %) in 2010 because it was a Republican wave year or even because the economy was still staggering from the Bush recession, although he needed to be more aggressive and frame it better. He lost because he ran a defensive campaign and made some moves that alienated some of the Democratic base. Not all of those people have forgotten. After the election, the ODP campaign strategists admitted that they were short volunteers to get the job done and that was why: Strickland alienated them.
I don't want to rehash bygones in detail but a lot of it boiled down to his support for former state representative Jennifer Garrison for a slot on the statewide ticket, despite the fact that she was anti-choice and anti-gay (read more here if you must: http://www.ohiodailyblog.com/content/jennifer-garrison-unacceptable) and his (or his staff's) crossing some ethical lines in support of Lee Fisher's primary candidacy for the U.S. Senate against Portman — a seat either he or his primary opponent Jennifer Brunner should have won.
Well known blogger and activist Jill Miller Zimon along with Beth Sebian an activist in progressive issues and politics have launched a new initiative. The initiative is OpenNEO. OpenNEO is an effort to bring the open data movement to northeast Ohio. What is open data? This video will explain...
This is a great and important initiative Ms. Zimon and Ms. Sebian are bringing to northeast Ohio. I've become aware that there is too much information hidden behind paywalls or is unaggregated making it too difficult to find in its fractured state. Some research databases have annual fees of up to $30,000 to access timely quality information and studies. I believe that as individuals we are all suffering from some kind of digital divide. Even high net worth people would have a difficult time keeping up with access fees if they had to do it all on their own. I think all professional people rely on the institutions they work for to pay for access and membership fees.
But if the internet is to really fulfill its promise of being a great equalizer where anyone can logon and educate themselves in a variety of subjects, then this issue has to be addressed. Perhaps the Opendata movement is an initial step in doing that.
The OpenNEO web site can be found here: www.openneo.org
You can follow them on Twitter here: https://twitter.com/openneo