Kucinich statement
Here's Dennis Kucinich's statement about why he voted against the health-care reform bill in the House last night. It will be interesting to see if the corporate community — long gunning for him and feeling its oats after its thorough duping of the public on Issue 6 last Tuesday — will back another primary challenge to him. (It's possible he will back the final bill. It's often hard to figure out what he will do.)
http://kucinich.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=153995
Washington, Nov 7 -
After voting against H.R. 3962 - Affordable Health Care for America Act, Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) today made the following statement:
“We have been led to believe that we must make our health care choices only within the current structure of a predatory, for-profit insurance system which makes money not providing health care. We cannot fault the insurance companies for being what they are. But we can fault legislation in which the government incentivizes the perpetuation, indeed the strengthening, of the for-profit health insurance industry, the very source of the problem. When health insurance companies deny care or raise premiums, co-pays and deductibles they are simply trying to make a profit. That is our system.
“Clearly, the insurance companies are the problem, not the solution. They are driving up the cost of health care. Because their massive bureaucracy avoids paying bills so effectively, they force hospitals and doctors to hire their own bureaucracy to fight the insurance companies to avoid getting stuck with an unfair share of the bills. The result is that since 1970, the number of physicians has increased by less than 200% while the number of administrators has increased by 3000%. It is no wonder that 31 cents of every health care dollar goes to administrative costs, not toward providing care. Even those with insurance are at risk. The single biggest cause of bankruptcies in the U.S. is health insurance policies that do not cover you when you get sick.
“But instead of working toward the elimination of for-profit insurance, H.R. 3962 would put the government in the role of accelerating the privatization of health care. In H.R. 3962, the government is requiring at least 21 million Americans to buy private health insurance from the very industry that causes costs to be so high, which will result in at least $70 billion in new annual revenue, much of which is coming from taxpayers. This inevitably will lead to even more costs, more subsidies, and higher profits for insurance companies — a bailout under a blue cross.
“By incurring only a new requirement to cover pre-existing conditions, a weakened public option, and a few other important but limited concessions, the health insurance companies are getting quite a deal. The Center for American Progress’ blog, Think Progress, states “since the President signaled that he is backing away from the public option, health insurance stocks have been on the rise.” Similarly, healthcare stocks rallied when Senator Max Baucus introduced a bill without a public option. Bloomberg reports that Curtis Lane, a prominent health industry investor, predicted a few weeks ago that “money will start flowing in again” to health insurance stocks after passage of the legislation. Investors.com last month reported that pharmacy benefit managers share prices are hitting all-time highs, with the only industry worry that the Administration would reverse its decision not to negotiate Medicare Part D drug prices, leaving in place a Bush Administration policy.
“During the debate, when the interests of insurance companies would have been effectively challenged, that challenge was turned back. The “robust public option” which would have offered a modicum of competition to a monopolistic industry was whittled down from an initial potential enrollment of 129 million Americans to 6 million. An amendment which would have protected the rights of states to pursue single-payer health care was stripped from the bill at the request of the Administration. Looking ahead, we cringe at the prospect of even greater favors for insurance companies.
“Recent rises in unemployment indicate a widening separation between the finance economy and the real economy. The finance economy considers the health of Wall Street, rising corporate profits, and banks’ hoarding of cash, much of it from taxpayers, as sign of an economic recovery. However in the real economy -- in which most Americans live -- the recession is not over. Rising unemployment, business failures, bankruptcies and foreclosures are still hammering Main Street.
“This health care bill continues the redistribution of wealth to Wall Street at the expense of America’s manufacturing and service economies which suffer from costs other countries do not have to bear, especially the cost of health care. America continues to stand out among all industrialized nations for its privatized health care system. As a result, we are less competitive in steel, automotive, aerospace and shipping while other countries subsidize their exports in these areas through socializing the cost of health care.
“Notwithstanding the fate of H.R. 3962, America will someday come to recognize the broad social and economic benefits of a not-for-profit, single-payer health care system, which is good for the American people and good for America’s businesses, with of course the notable exceptions being insurance and pharmaceuticals.”
# # #







The corporate community? How
The corporate community? How about the Progressives of the 10th District backing a primary? This is the latest in a series of unforgivable "nay" votes from Kucinich. He has opposed major pieces of legislation from S-CHIP to Obama's budget to the Health Care bill because they didn't conform to his highest ideals. Ted Kennedy often said "Never let perfection be the enemy of good." Dennis doesn't get this. He needs a wakeup call.
Well, that is certainly possible too
It's just that the corporate community has the money to get the job done, and if they run another Joe Cimperman type (or Joe himself) who is plausibly progressive (I'll bet Joe would have voted for the health-care bill!), that could be all she wrote. Dennis has his devoted admirers but also people who are getting very frustrated with him, and I don't know if being so unpredictable and having such a high standard for legislation is going to help or hurt him (Remember he voted against ACES too).
I get what he is standing up for, and I can't say I disagree with his principles. I'm also disappointed that the Democratic leadership sold women's rights down the river and got virtually nothing in return in terms of votes. (John Boccieri, who voted to limit women's choice but still voted against the final bill especially has a lot to answer for). But I think that this bill moves us ahead significantly in the fight to get fair health care in this country. It's not over yet, but sometimes it seems like Dennis wants to go from zero to one hundred in an instant.
Dennis gets it
Dennis Kucinch is the bravest person in America – never one to hold up his wet finger to gauge which direction the proverbial political winds are blowing.
The corporate interests that spend millions to influence the media and both political parties want you to ignore Dennis Kucinich. Too many Democrats unwittingly help them.
People like Dennis Kucinich have been made pariahs by establishment Democrats. They have all been marginalized, but check their records, review their historical fortitude. Kucinich has been considered a fringe character because he tells us the truth about corporate abuses of power long before the rest of us catch up to the reality of what’s happened.
If enough of us stand with Dennis Kucinich, maybe we’ll actually get real health care reform. If we don’t, maybe we don’t deserve that reform.
Maybe we do deserve a “reform” bill that is not the cure for what ails the American health care system. This bill, as it is currently constructed, could make a bad situation worse. Is the House Health Care bill really better than nothing at all?
I understand that many sincere progressives in the House, and outside of it, chose to back the bill as the best that could be gotten. Others supported it on the hope that flaws could be fixed in the Senate and in the reconciliation of the House and Senate bills. That a whole lot of ifs, ands or buts...any further gift offerings to the health insurance cartel.
The danger is that as costs continue to rise, coverage becomes less comprehensive and the “public option” (already set up to be 25% more expensive than the average private plan) is rigged to trigger its failure and people will conclude that we’ve tried health reform and it didn’t work.
The real problem will be that we didn’t really try. Cowardice ruled the day. Insurance companies are the problem, not the solution.
We simply capitulated to the highest level as this bill will enshrine into law the monopolistic powers of the private health insurance industry; falls far short in effective controls on skyrocketing insurance, pharmaceutical and hospital costs, does little to stop insurance companies from denying needed medical care recommended by doctors, embraces religious-right extremists as it obliterates for millions of women their fundamental right to choose and by requiring at least 25 million Americans to buy private health insurance from the very industry that causes costs to be so high, will result in at least $70 billion in new annual revenue coming from taxpayers.
I would rather see us do nothing now, and have a better chance of trying again later and then doing it right. As it stands now, we have rewarded, mandated and institutionalized the for-profit health insurance industry as our leading economic anchor and made the goal of universal health care for all Americans (Medicare for all) much more un-attainable. The House and Senate bills, unless radically amended, are not precursors to single-payer, but rather the termination of such legislation for the foreseeable future.